Predefinição:Grandes potências por data

Origem: Wikipédia, a enciclopédia livre.
1815 1878 1900 1919 1939 1945 c. 2000 c. 2010
 Prússia[1][2][3]  Alemanha[4]  Alemanha[5]  Alemanha[6]  Alemanha[7][1][8][9][10][11]  Alemanha[7][1][8][11][12][13]
 Áustria[1][2][3]  Áustria-Hungria[4]  Áustria-Hungria[5]
 China[1][14]  China[1][14][8][11][15][16]  China[1][14][8][11][15][17]
 Estados Unidos[5]  Estados Unidos[18]  Estados Unidos[6]  Estados Unidos[1][14][19]  Estados Unidos[7][1][14][8][20][9][10][11]  Estados Unidos[7][1][14][8][20][9][10][11]
França[1][2][3]  França[4]  França[5]  França[18]  França[6]  França[1][14]  França[7][1][14][8][9][10][11]  França[7][1][14][8][11][21]
 Itália[22][23][24][25]  Itália[5]  Itália[18]  Itália[6]  Itália[7][9][10][26][27][28]  Itália[7][9][10][29][30][31]
 Japão[5]  Japão[18][nota 1]  Japão[6]  Japão[1][8][15][32][9][11]  Japão[1][8][15][32][11][33]
 Império Britânico[1][2][3]  Império Britânico[4]  Império Britânico[5]  Império Britânico[18]  Reino Unido[nota 2][6]  Reino Unido[1][14][19]  Reino Unido[7][8][14][1][9][10][34][11][35][36]  Reino Unido[7][8][14][1][11][21][37]
 Rússia[1][2][3]  Rússia[4]  Rússia[5]  União Soviética[6]  União Soviética[1][14][19]  Rússia[1][14][8][15][9][10][11]  Rússia[1][14][8][15][11][38]

Notas incluídas na predefinição

  1. "O Primeiro-Ministro do Canadá disse durante o Tratado de Versalhes que 'só haviam {{subst:Número2palavra2|3}} grandes potências restantes no mundo:Estados Unidos, Grã-Bretanha e o Japão...' (mas) as grandes potências não puderam ser consistentes. "Em instância para o Reino Unido, eles deram 5 delegados para a Conferência de Paz, assim como para eles mesmos, mas no Conselho Supremo os japoneses eram ignorados ou tratados como uma piada." segundo MacMillan, Margaret (2003). Paris 1919. United States of America: Random House Trade. p. 306. ISBN 0-375-76052-0 
  2. Após o Estatuto de Westminster entrar em vigor em 1931, o Reino Unido não representava mais o Império Britânico a nível mundial.

Referências

  1. a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x Peter Howard (2008). «Great Powers». Encarta. MSN. Consultado em 20 de dezembro de 2008. Arquivado do original em 31 de outubro de 2009 
  2. a b c d e Fueter, Eduard (1922). World history, 1815–1920. United States of America: Harcourt, Brace and Company. pp. 25–28, 36–44. ISBN 1584770775 
  3. a b c d e Danilovic, Vesna. "When the Stakes Are High—Deterrence and Conflict among Major Powers", University of Michigan Press (2002), pp 27, 225–228 (PDF chapter downloads) (PDF copy).
  4. a b c d e McCarthy, Justin (1880). A History of Our Own Times, from 1880 to the Diamond Jubilee. New York, United States of America: Harper & Brothers, Publishers. pp. 475–476 
  5. a b c d e f g h Dallin, David. The Rise of Russia in Asia. [S.l.: s.n.] 
  6. a b c d e f g Harrison, M (2000) The Economics of World War II: Six Great Powers in International Comparison, Cambridge University Press.
  7. a b c d e f g h i j Canada Among Nations, 2004: Setting Priorities Straight. [S.l.]: McGill-Queen's Press - MQUP. 17 de janeiro de 2005. p. 85. ISBN 0773528369. Consultado em 13 de junho de 2016  ("The United States is the sole world's superpower. France, Italy, Germany and the United Kingdom are great powers")
  8. a b c d e f g h i j k l m n T. V. Paul; James J. Wirtz; Michel Fortmann (2005). Balance of Power. United States of America: State University of New York Press, 2005. pp. 59, 282. ISBN 0791464016  Accordingly, the great powers after the Cold War are Britain, China, France, Germany, Japan, Russia, and the United States p.59
  9. a b c d e f g h i Sterio, Milena (2013). The right to self-determination under international law : "selfistans", secession and the rule of the great powers. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. p. xii (preface). ISBN 0415668182. Consultado em 13 de junho de 2016  ("The great powers are super-sovereign states: an exclusive club of the most powerful states economically, militarily, politically and strategically. These states include veto-wielding members of the United Nations Security Council (United States, United Kingdom, France, China, and Russia), as well as economic powerhouses such as Germany, Italy and Japan.")
  10. a b c d e f g h Transforming Military Power since the Cold War: Britain, France, and the United States, 1991–2012. [S.l.]: Cambridge University Press. 2013. p. 224. ISBN 1107471494. Consultado em 13 de junho de 2016  (During the Kosovo War (1998) "...Contact Group consisting of six great powers (the United states, Russia, France, Britain, Germany and Italy).")
  11. a b c d e f g h i j k l m n Baron, Joshua (22 de janeiro de 2014). Great Power Peace and American Primacy: The Origins and Future of a New International Order. United States: Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 1137299487 
  12. Otte M, Greve J (2000) A Rising Middle Power?: German Foreign Policy in Transformation, 1989-1999, St. Martin's Press
  13. Sperling, James (2001). «Neither Hegemony nor Dominance: Reconsidering German Power in Post Cold-War Europe». British Journal of Political Science. 31 (2). doi:10.1017/S0007123401000151 
  14. a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o Louden, Robert (2007). The world we want. United States of America: Oxford University Press US. 187 páginas. ISBN 0195321375 
  15. a b c d e f UW Press: Korea's Future and the Great Powers
  16. Yong Deng and Thomas G. Moore (2004) "China Views Globalization: Toward a New Great-Power Politics?" The Washington Quarterly[ligação inativa]
  17. Yong Deng and Thomas G. Moore (2004) "China Views Globalization: Toward a New Great-Power Politics?" The Washington Quarterly[ligação inativa]
  18. a b c d e MacMillan, Margaret (2003). Paris 1919. United States of America: Random House Trade. pp. 36, 306, 431. ISBN 0-375-76052-0 
  19. a b c The Superpowers: The United States, Britain and the Soviet Union – Their Responsibility for Peace (1944), written by William T.R. Fox
  20. a b «Analyzing American Power in the Post-Cold War Era». Consultado em 28 de fevereiro de 2007 
  21. a b P. Shearman, M. Sussex, European Security After 9/11(Ashgate, 2004) - According to Shearman and Sussex, both the UK and France were great powers now reduced to middle power status.
  22. Kennedy, Paul (1987). The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers. United States of America: Random House. p. 204. ISBN 0-394-54674-1 
  23. Best, Antony; Hanhimäki, Jussi; Maiolo, Joseph; Schulze, Kirsten (2008). International History of the Twentieth Century and Beyond. United States of America: Routledge. p. 9. ISBN 0415438969 
  24. Wight, Martin (2002). Power Politics. United Kingdom: Continuum International Publishing Group. p. 46. ISBN 0826461743 
  25. Waltz, Kenneth (1979). Theory of International Politics. United States of America: McGraw-Hill. p. 162. ISBN 0-07-554852-6 
  26. "Italy plays a prominent role in European and global military, cultural and diplomatic affairs. The country's European political, social and economic influence make it a major regional power." See Italy: Justice System and National Police Handbook, Vol. 1 (Washington, D.C.: International Business Publications, 2009), p. 9.
  27. Italy: 150 years of a small great power, eurasia-rivista.org, 21 December 2010
  28. Verbeek, Bertjan; Giacomello, Giampiero (2011). Italy's foreign policy in the twenty-first century : the new assertiveness of an aspiring middle power. Lanham, Md.: Lexington Books. ISBN 978-0-7391-4868-6 
  29. "Italy plays a prominent role in European and global military, cultural and diplomatic affairs. The country's European political, social and economic influence make it a major regional power." See Italy: Justice System and National Police Handbook, Vol. 1 (Washington, D.C.: International Business Publications, 2009), p. 9.
  30. Italy: 150 years of a small great power, eurasia-rivista.org, 21 December 2010
  31. Verbeek, Bertjan; Giacomello, Giampiero (2011). Italy's foreign policy in the twenty-first century : the new assertiveness of an aspiring middle power. Lanham, Md.: Lexington Books. ISBN 978-0-7391-4868-6 
  32. a b Richard N. Haass, "Asia's overlooked Great Power", Project Syndicate April 20, 2007.
  33. Robert W. Cox, 'Middlepowermanship, Japan, and Future World Order, International Journal, Vol. 44, No. 4 (1989), pp. 823-862.
  34. McCourt, David (28 de maio de 2014). Britain and World Power Since 1945: Constructing a Nation's Role in International Politics. United States of America: University of Michigan Press. ISBN 0472072218 
  35. Chalmers, Malcolm (maio de 2015). «A Force for Order: Strategic Underpinnings of the Next NSS and SDSR». Royal United Services Institute. Briefing Paper (SDSR 2015: Hard Choices Ahead): 2. While no longer a superpower (a position it lost in the 1940s), the UK remains much more than a 'middle power'. 
  36. Walker, William (22 de setembro de 2015). «Trident's Replacement and the Survival of the United Kingdom». International Institute for Strategic Studies, Global Politics and Strategy. 57 (5): 7-28. Consultado em 31 de dezembro de 2015. Trident as a pillar of the transatlantic relationship and symbol of the UK's desire to remain a great power with global reach. 
  37. Chalmers, Malcolm (maio de 2015). «A Force for Order: Strategic Underpinnings of the Next NSS and SDSR». Royal United Services Institute. Briefing Paper (SDSR 2015: Hard Choices Ahead): 2. While no longer a superpower (a position it lost in the 1940s), the UK remains much more than a ‘middle power’. 
  38. Neumann, Iver B. (2008). «Russia as a great power, 1815–2007». Journal of International Relations and Development. 11: 128–151 [p. 128]. doi:10.1057/jird.2008.7. As long as Russia's rationality of government deviates from present-day hegemonic neo-liberal models by favouring direct state rule rather than indirect governance, the West will not recognize Russia as a fully fledged great power.